Sandra Bullock Speech No Raspberry

March 10th, 2010

Actress Sandra Bullock achieved a double distinction this weekend. On Saturday she won a Razzie Award for worst actress of the year (“All About Steve”) and on Sunday night she won the more notable Best Actress Oscar for “The Blind Side.”

Typically the Golden Raspberry awards go uncollected by their winners. There’s no denying that the Golden Raspberry Award Foundation that organises the Razzies aims for jollity and well-aimed swipes at movie stars. So it should be no surprise that few actors readily collect their Golden Raspberries. But there are exceptions. And Sandra Bullock is an exception. Entering into the spirit of the occasion, she attended the event, collected her prize and gave an impressive acceptance speech.

Her speech was humorous and clever from the start. She deftly took charge of the proceedings with some excellent lines, good use of stage props and stage personnel. She made some good points about her film, she challenged her audience to do someting–watch the movie–and she gave everyone in the audience a DVD to help them do so.

In all, a very polished and professional speech that should further boost her reputation.

YouTube Speech Signals Jerry Brown Candidacy

March 8th, 2010

Veteran California Attorney General Jerry Brown has used a speech on YouTube to announce his candidacy for Governor this year.

In a brief three minute speech to camera the former Governor laid out his case as a serious candidate. There’s no denying that he’s serious. His speech is forceful and direct, making good use of lists of three throughout the speech. For example, the budget is described as “always late, in the red and wrong.”

Alliteration features heavily with phrases such as, “partisan paralysis,”  “political posturing,”  “puppy slogans and platitudes” and  “knowledge and know-how.”

His approach to pausing is reminiscent of another former California Governor–Ronald Reagan. They appear when you least expect them and in the oddest places. But it’s effective.

As a politician he’s well versed in using a contrast approach to his speeches: “when it works and when it doesn’t work. And it’s no secret that Sacramento isn’t working today.” He then picks up this theme in his conclusion: “let’s get California working again.

In all, a neat and tidy three minute political speech.

Ballmer Speech: A Kind of Microsoft Approach to Sort of Cloud Computing

March 5th, 2010
Steve Ballmer

Steve Ballmer, CEO Microsoft

A certain stage presence and style characterises the Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer. Energetic, dynamic and loud! That style has proved useful as the CEO advances the Microsoft strategy around the world; not least since Bill Gates stood down from active Microsoft duties.

His most recent speech at the University of Washington was a big draw for the student body and teaching staff. Standing room only was the order of the day.

Steve got a great introduction and a very warm reception. And quite right to. He’s a charismatic and competent speaker. Who can remember the Longhorn speeches?

But on this occasion, despite the support of his team and their superb multimedia, there was an issue. Steve had gone native. Leaving all thought of syntax and language structure aside, the CEO of one of the most important businesses in the world approached his speech as if he was in his first year at college. For example his use of the phrase, “sort of” was continual:

“sort of a place…
sort of highlighting…
sort of is…
sort of recent…
sort of the sub-history…
sort of stimulated…
sort of describe…
sort of story…
sort of creative commons…
sort of PhotoSynth…
sort of information…
sort of me…
sort of natural gas…

Now this sort of sloppy approach to language is one thing for a, like,  industrious student. But for a man who heads up the world’s kind of leading software language coding businesses it’s different.

Let’s hope that the Microsoft approach to cloud computing is more rigorous than the language of this speech. Sort of.

George Osborne. Reasons to be Cheerful?

February 28th, 2010
George Osborne MP

George Osborne's Brighton Conference Speech

With only weeks to go before a General Election politicians from all parties need to make themselves heard. For George Osborne, the Conservative shadow chancellor, that need is greater than most.

In his speech at the Tories Spring conference yesterday he laid out a set of measures that he and his team would implement. He began well, noting that there were “less than 70 days” to go before a General Election. He repeated the phrase twice and then used the same phrase twice in his conclusion. A good use of repetition.

But the pedant in me just hates “less than 70 days.” “Fewer than 70 days” would be better!

His beginning noted that choices had to be made. Likening these choices with those that had to be made in 1979 was a simple public speaking manoeuvre. It suits George and his colleagues to compare themselves with the reformists of the Thatcher administration. In truth, there’s a gulf of difference.

His focus on the failings of Gordon Brown, ex-Chancellor and Prime Minister was relentless. He raised a laugh by noting the apparent spat between the Prime Minister and the current Chancellor; particularly the Prime Minister’s refusal to confirm that Mr Darling would still be Chancellor if Labour was to win:

If Gordon Brown wins, he will go down in history.

He’ll be the first person to deliberately choose Ed Balls as his next door neighbour.”

He aimed for some topicality in a week that saw Andy Serkis and his new film, “Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll” up for a BAFTA award. “So let me give you Reasons to be Cheerful.” Topical and cheeky, but probably lost on his Brighton audience.

Reaching his conclusion the shadow chancellor used a position taker to reinforce the gulf between him and the Prime Minister:

The Prime Minister unleashes the forces of hell.

I want us to unleash the forces of enterprise.

Clever and topical. His conclusion raised the temperature, albeit I once again took exception to…”Less than 70 days.

Colin Firth Cool With BAFTA Fridge Speech

February 24th, 2010
Colin Firth BAFTA

Colin Firth's BAFTA Speech

Brevity and wit characterised Colin Firth’s acceptance speech at the BAFTA Awards in London.

In stark contrast to other less well-worked speeches, the Best Actor winner related a story about how his email declining the role in the Tom Ford movie, A Single Man, might have been sent had he not been interrupted by a fridge repair man.

Marked by regular laughs, his short speech paid fulsome tribute to his director, his colleagues, his wife Livia and “the fridge guy”.

Jamie’s Winners. The TED 2010 Presentation

February 22nd, 2010
Jamie Oliver

Jamie Oliver, TED 2010 Winner

A chance to speak at a TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) event in California is classed as an opportunity for any presenter. When that opportunity comes with the added boost of a $100,000 TED prize then you know it’s special.

And that probably describes Jamie Oliver’s TED presentation. Special.

Devoted to “Ideas worth spreading,” the TED organisers awarded Jamie Oliver’s diet campaign the 2010 TED prize at their conference earlier this month.

Jamie Oliver is not the best speaker. His tv performances certainly benefit from the odd second take…or more. But what he lacks in speech structure and language he more than compensates with imagination, creativity and passion. And it’s that passion that really struck home with his presentation audience.

His 18 minute presentation had a shaky, nervous start. Then after a minute or so he warmed to the task. His hand-carried notes were not needed. He presented a series of winners.

As he warmed to his theme, so his audience warmed to him and his subject…not least with his show of hands for parents, grandparents, uncles and aunts in the room. That show of hands made his audience live the reality of childhood obesity in the USA.

He’s not afraid to use numbers. Obesity costs the USA some $150 billion annually. And that figure will rise further. The top killers in America are diet related–not the usual scary suspect: homicide.

But, putting things in perspective, said Jamie, “England is right behind you. As usual.” This got a huge laugh from his audience. A perfect delivery.

His use of  media was excellent, with film of the Edwards family in West Virginia and some schoolchildren guessing the names of vegetables! The point was made. If they don’t know what it is, they simply will not eat it. Ever.

His demonstration of the size and scale of sugar additives in children’s school milk was well-worked. Tremendous imagery with a wheelbarrow load of sugar.

Part of his charm as a presenter is that of “the innocent abroad.” But his reference to Mrs Obama’s campaigning underlined the connections that he clearly enjoys. Catering for the G20 Summit in London last year proved valuable for the campaign.

This was Jamie at his best. Yes, he looked over his shoulder at the screen for inspiration. And his presentation lacked structure. But he firmly engaged with his audience and left them with something other than a take-away.

Mandela. The Undefeated Man in the Arena

February 19th, 2010
Nelson Mandela and Francois Pienaar

Francois Pienaar receives the Webb Ellis trophy in 1995

Hollywood’s big on symbolism; often using symbolism instead of accuracy. “Invictus”, the new Clint Eastwood film takes full advantage of  symbolism…and stretches accuracy. The title, “Invictus” is drawn from the eponymous nineteenth century poem by William Henley; a poem that Nelson Mandela had with him whilst in captivity on Robben Island. True and accurate.

In the film, Nelson Mandela gives the poem to the Springboks rugby captain, Francois Pienaar, before his World Cup Final match with New Zealand in 1995. Great symbolism. Not so accurate, however.

In reality President Mandela gave the Springboks team some equally inspiring words. A 1910 speech by Theodore Roosevelt, “the Man in the Arena.” In essence, President Mandela chose a speech with far more relevance for the team about to face the All Blacks in the Ellis Park Stadium. A great choice of words.

Oscars, Mikes and the 45 Second Speech Rule

February 18th, 2010
Oscar Academy Awards

Oscar Award Speeches Cut

Academy Award organisers have acted over lengthy Oscar Awards night speeches; lengthy speeches that have characterised the recent televised Oscar award ceremonies.

At issue are the long-winded, incoherent and largely self-centred speeches of winning stars and starlets. To the winner they might be endearing, but to the world’s TV viewers they have proved tedious. Advertisers share that view.

This year, say the organisers, winners will be restricted to 45 seconds of speech in front of the mike.

Here’s to brevity, wit and coherence in the film industry.

Nelson’s Speech. Winnie’s Glasses. A Nation’s Hero.

February 12th, 2010
Nelson Mandela's release after 27 years imprisonment

Nelson and Winnie Mandela after his 1990 release

With the 20th anniversary of the release of Nelson Mandela from prison in South Africa comes the memory of his Cape Town speech on that day in 1990. Amid scenes of wild jubilation and some chaos, Mandela brought out his prepared speech and reached into his pocket for his glasses.

They weren’t there! He’d left them in Victor Verster prison. No panic. Knowing that his wife Winnie had a similar optical prescription to his own, Mandela borrowed her glasses and began his speech after 27 years of captivity. Resourceful and resilient, glasses or no glasses.

Sarah Palin: A Hand to Mouth Existence?

February 10th, 2010
Sarah Palin: Candidate?

Sarah Palin speaks at the Tea Party Convention

Former Alaska Governor and Republican Vice-President Candidate Sarah Palin caught our attention this week. The occasion? The National Tea Party Convention in Nashville. This low-tax and minimum-State lobbying organisation hired Sarah Palin for its key-note speaker…at some considerable expense.

Yes, many of the Tea Party members balked at the price of tickets to attend the occasion. But they received the publicity that they would not othersise have got from the world’s media. Quite a coup.

Sarah Palin’s speech was marked by two items. The first was her use of scribbled notes on her own hand…much like a builder taking down key measurements without paper to hand. Well, that was the state of her manicured hand: inky.

The notes in question?

“Energy”

“Tax Cuts”

“Lift American Spirits”

There was another, “Budget Cuts,” but its place was taken by “Tax Cuts.”

It’s somewhat heartening to find that someone who aspires to the greatest office of state still depends on such a simple prompting device. Or was it, perhaps, part of her manicured blue-collar image?

That thought arose during the question and answer (Q&A) session that followed her speech. Someone in the crowd asked Sarah Palin for her view on the top three things a Republican majority in Congress would focus on. The answer:

“Energy, Tax Cuts and Lift Americans Spirits.” Well fancy that.

A planted question for a well-prepared speaker.