Kepler Presentation: Is There Anybody Out There?

July 28th, 2010

The age-old question, “Is there anybody out there?” was put into a historical context by Harvard astronomer, Dimitar Sasselov, in his TED Global presentation in Oxford.

Sasselov, who is one of the team leaders in the NASA Kepler planet-hunting telescope program, began his presentation with a reference to a recent burial. The reburial of Nicolaus Copernicus in Frombork, Poland following the discovery of his remains in the cathedral in 2005.

His presentation showed how our understanding of the solar system was turned around by Copernicus; the sun became the central body and the earth became a component.

That understanding remains central to the NASA Kepler mission which sets out to observe the small and medium sized planets in the solar system. Large planets have been discovered in the last ten years or so, but they are not as significant for life-support as smaller planets.

The presentation noted how Kepler observation and statistical extrapolation suggests that there are many earth-like small planets capable of sustaining life: perhaps as many as 100 million.

It was this figure that seized the news headlines after Sasselov’s presentation.

But the essence of his TED presentation was captured in the questions he then asked his audience:

“Is life on other planets the same as life on Earth?”

and,

“Is Earth biochemistry universal?”

Using video, images and graphs the Harvard astronomer set out some of the thinking and many of the lines of enquiry. He clarified that his team doesn’t have answers yet. There’s so much more to know.

But he forced his audience to think of the links between biology and astronomy…links that he had referenced with the DNA fingerprinting of Copernicus’ body in Frombork. Using his own neck tie as a prop he showed how insignificant, in terms of quantity, is the scale of life in the universe.

But, referring back to his Copernicus introduction, he noted how significance might be a function of time, not just quantity. That is, our stewardship of life on earth is significant with the relative youth of our solar system. That relative youth suggests that we are not being too fanciful about supporting life systems on other planets…eventually. It’s all about time.

A fascinating presentation from an inspiring presenter.

Your email:

 

Mr Brown I Presume? Gordon Brown Found Speaking in Kampala

July 27th, 2010
Gordon Brown MP

Gordon Brown's speech in Kampala, Uganda

Former Premier Gordon Brown gave his first major speech since leaving 10 Downing Street in May this year. His speech followed a period of quiet and relative isolation for Mr Brown.

But unlike his Scottish predecessor, Mr Livingstone, Gordon gave his speech at a meeting of African Leaders in Kampala, Uganda, where he called for greater interdependence and unity between African nations.

It wasn’t a classic speech. But the craft of the speech writer was there for all to see.

Not a classic? No, Gordon Brown is still prone to the lengthy sentence structure that characterised much of his work when he was Prime Minister:

“The only way out of this vicious spiral of less spending, slower growth and fewer jobs is for the G2O to agree a strategy for global growth which has as its goal increased world growth worth 3 trillion and 30 million jobs over the next three years, and has at its the idea that Africa is not the problem but a key part of the solution.”

But the speech had some nuggets. Early on it referenced the words of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s 1945 musical, Carousel:

“You will never walk alone.”

And that reference also bore a hint of Martin Luther King’s Lincoln Memorial speech of 1963: “we cannot walk alone.

A coincidence? Possibly not. Gordon Brown then went on to say:

“instead we need to match the onward march.”

And Martin Luther King? In 1963 he said:

“As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead.”

Where Gordon Brown noted in his speech:

“Even though Africa paid a high price for financial problems caused elsewhere, this is not the time to decouple Africa from the world economy, or to abandon market-based competition.”

Martin Luther King noted in 1963:

“This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy.”

It’s more than coincidence and shows the level of political insight needed to make big landmark speeches such as these.

Other traits of the political speech writer were also evident. There were position takers:

“Some people will say these balances are inevitable, that the world is out of kilter and there’s simply nothing you can do. But I believe there is an alternative.”

There was a neat phrase reversal:

“you all know that President Obama spent some time as a community organiser before becoming a politician. I’m somebody who spent some time as a politician before becoming a community organiser.”

And he also used the not this but that clause:

“The future is no longer giving and receiving, but instead investing together in a future which is shared.”

Despite the hints to that great speech writer Martin Luther King, this was no classic. Some lines were pure new Labour…horribly forgettable. Lines such as:

“As we unravel this we know the situation going forward is unsustainable.”

Neither classic, nor classy. But sufficiently well-written to make it very worthwhile.

Your email:

 

Death by PowerPoint: Kimberly-Clark Presents Q2 Figures

July 26th, 2010

Leading household essentials business Kimberly-Clark announced its Q2 2010 earnings on 23rd July. Using a live webcast conference call the management team outlined their results for the Quarter.

Supporting this essential piece of investor relations was a beautifully presented PowerPoint™ presentation. It was a beautifully presented package, but its beauty stopped there–at the packaging. Because the Kimberly-Clark earnings PowerPoint™ show was essentially yet another piece of corporate presentation-ware.

They used a standard corporate template, bullet lists and bullet dashes were everywhere. Yes, there were product pictures, but they never had the prominence that they deserved. Instead it was text that had the priority. Large text, small text and even smaller text. One slide–slide 23–contained some 125 words. And nothing else.

It’s indicative of a wider corporate presentation malaise. And it will take some curing.

Hasbro Comic-Con 2010 Presentation is PowerPoint Clone

July 25th, 2010
Comic-Con 2010 Hasbro Presentation

Hasbro presentation at San Diego Comic-Con 2010 disappoints with PowerPoint clone.

Many of the biggest names in the comic-strip film  and entertainment industries have been at the Comic-Con 2010 show that finishes today in San Diego. It’s an unparalleled event showcasing the work of artists, designers and film makers.

One such design team is that of Hasbro who showcased their new models in San Diego. The design team is huge and had prepared some impressive work for the event.

But their choice of presentation material–albeit, as shown on the web–is uninspiring.

Their presentation appears to be a poorly constructed PowerPoint™ slide deck of some 55 slides. It’s a classic piece of corporate branded PowerPoint™. There’s a Hasbro branded header and a footer on most slides; those that don’t have a header and footer feature a Hasbro watermark.

Pictures and illustrations abound. Yet they don’t dominate the visual landscape. Instead small images of the popular Hasbro figures are placed in small holders throughout the slide presentation. Often they have to fight for space with other images from the Hasbro stable. Or worse still–bullet points. In some cases the pictures obscure the blue Hasbro logo in the Hasbro footer…negating the case for the footer.

The screen text would have to be unreadable to the audience. A better tactic would be to get rid of most, if not all, of the text. And the remaining text? Bulk it up. Beef it up like the Hasbro characters themselves and give the words focus and standing.

It’s a very disappointing corporate presentation that had the potential to be much better. There’s a wealth of creative talent in the Hasbro design and marketing teams that presented at Comic-Con 2010. And there’s also a wealth of illustrative material that could be superbly photographed and presented.

It’s not a PowerPoint problem but undoubtedly a management presenting problem. Clone Wars = good. PowerPoint™ clone = bad.

Your email:

 

McChrystal’s Fort McNair Speech Marks Time on General’s Career

July 24th, 2010

With echoes of the 1951 forced retirement of General Douglas MacArthur from his UN Korea command, General Stanley McChrystal retired from the US army this week.

Both Generals had a difference of opinion with their respective Presidents–Harry Truman and Barack Obama. McChrystal’s 2010 retirement had the contemporary edge provided by his idle words in an interview with Rolling Stone magazine. And MacArthur’s had the cold war connotations of a war with China.

Their retirement speeches had geographic similarities. General Douglas MacArthur’s speech was to a joint session of Congress in the Capital. And General McChrystal’s speech was at a military review in Fort McNair, Washington D.C.

MacArthur’s speech to Congress is remembered for the line:

“And like the old soldier in that ballad, I now close my military career and just fade away, an old soldier who tried to do his duty as God gave him the sight to see that duty.”

And General McChrystal’s best line from his 18 minute speech last week?

“I have stories on all of you, photos on many, and I know a Rolling Stone reporter.”

A great humorous line that worked hard at the beginning of his wistful speech that paid full compliments to his troops, colleagues, family and political masters. Full of humour, much of it self-deprecating, the General’s speech showed his class at his final military review.